Difference Between Yellow And White Shea Butter

supposedly regained Mafia

On Tuesday, an event occurred that obscures the path to a quality university education in the country. In the Education Commission of the Congress was closed on predictamen proposing a new university law. This proposal was an effort to synthesize 15 bills introduced over the last two periods congressional and has been discussed in a dozen national public hearings in recent years. So why have not wanted to discuss?

This story begins in 2001, when promoting university reform Second draft with the challenge of building a quality university system. By Supreme Resolution, establishing the National Commission for the Second Amendment University (CNSRU) which prepared a Draft Law University and an assessment of the situation of the university.

Between 2004 and 2006, held public forums in different universities in Lima and provinces to discuss the details of the university bill that would replace the 23733 law enacted in 1983. These forums were set up in spaces for meeting and discussion between representatives of the university community and civil society, whose contributions enriched the contributions made by CNSRU.

These contributions were collected by the current Congress Education Commission organized new consultation meetings in Lima and in the interior of the country to reach predictamen raised, inter alia, principles and rules shall preside at all universities without distinction on origin. Recall that, at present, public universities are governed by the law 23733, while most private they do it by DL 882 enacted during the Fujimori government, which creates the "owner universities." It is also noted that the university is, above all, a research and teaching must create new knowledge for the development of the country.

After corruption scandals generated in the wake of Wings University of Peru, was urgently needed to discuss, finally, what characteristics would the new university law. However, Congress Mercedes Cabanillas (APRA), Martha Hildebrandt (Alliance for the Future), Yonhy Lescano (Parliamentary Alliance), Mario Alegría (APRA) and Oswaldo Luiz (Bloque Popular) voted against the opinion and, conversely, Cabanillas supported the position, for whom the Law 23733, as amended and 20 times, you just need some more changes and should remain in force.

In this way, filed nearly 10 years of continuous work by having a standard that conforms to the university in Peru to the rhythm of the most prestigious in Latin America and the world. Why kicked the dialogue on this initiative? What interests are behind? Apparently the mafia that rules much of the public and private universities has played a new pass against quality college education, because a change of this magnitude directly affects their interests