VIVA JUSTICE SOURCE
Author (s): Cruz Silva Del Carpio
A feature that is where to point the judiciary, its authorities and the judicial system. Is it happening now? The dissent is "separated from the common doctrine, belief or behavior" (Royal Academy of English Language), which in the current judiciary is to score away from situations such as excessive judicial burden, the delay of the processes, the lack of interest citizens who attending the service of justice, the invisibility of the woman judge and litigator and their barriers to equal treatment in the system, the criticism of judicial independence, criticism of the lack of impartiality, failures and questionable actions in paradigmatic cases human rights and corruption, lack of performance measurement of public service with real standards and progressive enhancement, the lack of multicultural and gender barriers, lack of proper coordination with other organs of the justice system (such as CNM, for example) for a quality judiciary, the absence of a mentality that is the common processing denominator of the judiciary at the level of treatment to citizens as internal changes from the authorities, lack of self-criticism among peers for a bad team spirit.
Much is said and diagnosed by a reform of the justice system for more than a decade ... now, when the air reformers are absent, the more urgent task. There was progress in structural regulations such as the Judicial Career Law (now, is quite diminished as designed) but has been shown that if not interpreted properly and are coordinated to make it a reality, we are nothing. Who is the task? Without doubt, not only of the judiciary, but it is required. With that system authorities have failed to give a 180 degree turn, permanently and structural defects of the justice system for several years, the authorship of the change lies more strongly in each and every one of the judges, in each and every one of the judges. Hard, clear, no such orders of power within the judiciary that somehow have maintained the status quo, but there is an interesting combination to try again, between transparency and joint work with civil society. Does the requirement? To be a dissident, begin to transform the legal culture, which goes hand in hand with the head-on the power of that status quo policy, convenience, lack of transparency.
Without doubt, one must separate the wheat from the chaff. The judge and the judge are key actors in the justice that we all want, we can not say "congratulations" in general the work ordered and carried out. The reason is simple: justice is not, despite some signs in the court action, to celebrate, as we have observed (see for example, from "The Anti-Imperialism and the APRA" to "Clientelism and APRA" in the justice system. less independent justice will leave the second government of Garcia). But this, well worth targeting the those judges and judges, with the resources they have and their different personal realities, give your best and take forward the justice we need. Not the most experience but are, to them and they are our greetings, they are what we need: a living example of the dissident.
That is why we can not continue to have examples of a judge who apparently held that the defendant released (see: A judge held a former inmate who freed. Peru.21, 04 / 08/2010) of officers of the justice system that distort the break of the disciplinary system belies the functional misconduct declared, the highest representative of the judiciary publicly signing a greeting to the Cardinal when your institution is part of a judicial process (see: press release, El Comercio, 27.07.2010) ... want more examples of a judge that counter guarantees the rights of a disabled person, or protect the rights of a pregnant student is deprived of its eduicación by her pregnancy, we want more examples of judges who punish and investigate it.
And of course we want the decision, action and coordination of the judicial authorities with relevant institutions to the judiciary is given the best conditions of work, guarantee its independence and recognition their merits (without double standards.) That, in the midst of the ongoing reform of the rules of selection and appointment of the National Judicial Council, the call for ratification, the next change in the Presidency of the Judiciary and Supreme Courts, one day you invisible to the permanent judges, including legislative proposals (see: proposals), it requires judges and judges who are dissidents, that demonstrate what is wrong even from within and advance the changes we need. Can not wait any longer.
0 comments:
Post a Comment